Good insight Ian into the meeting. They certainly had a sizable number of speakers from officialdom putting the case for Winklebury. David Partridge who was excellent again and myself spoke for remaining at the Camrose for the time being and honouring the Covenant. Obviously it looks like the puppet master is likely to get his way; why listen to the fans ?.
The Winklebury project already had a fair head of steam behind it prior to the meeting and will probably succeed. A number of Councillors are going to look in to the Covenant so it is not completely dead.
I feel we are taking part in a play 'Ali Baba and the 40 thieves' in downtown Baghdad.
Terry Brown of course commands respect from all and I liked his presentation.
So not much more left to say except to wish them good luck. I will not be watching BTFC anytime soon that is for sure.
Not able to make tonight due to the wife's birthday. One thing i have to pick up upon is that I can tell you all from a legal perspective there is no hope at all in anyone thinking there is still mileage left into looking into the Covenant and thinking that it will save the club from leaving The Camrose.
The councillors can look into the Covenant as much as they like but it is dead, null and void. There is nothing they can do about it at all. Rafi is the landlord of the lease to BTFC, of which he is also a director, so therefore no one can do anything and that is the 100% legal situation folks whether we like it or not. The lease is the value and could be kept for another 32 years if wanted but if the owner decides he wants The Camrose for a different purpose at any given time then that's it. We really do have to move on.
RIP CAMROSE - SADLY AND UNCEREMONIOUSLY TAKEN AWAY FROM THE PEOPLE OF BASINGSTOKE . NEVER TO BE FORGOTTEN
Prejudice is a great TIME SAVER. You can form opinions without having to get to the FACTS.
You done yourself proud tonight Dave as IMO everyone did who spoke regardless of which way the club's heading. Not a bad turnout but in all honesty disappointed with many fans who talk the talk but always seem to have a bigger pressing engagement or work gets in the way Sorry to hear you've decided to give football a miss down where ever we'll be playing next season as it's plain to see you still have so much passion for the club
I am one of those who has taken a step back from the politics, but I read up on the meeting documentation online before it and it seemed obvious to me that Winklebury was the only solution where the Council would help football stay in the town.
I think Steve Williams has done remarkably well to get this far so fast and I hope the Covenant doesn't become a delaying distraction that scuppers this deal.
Like it or not, we are still in Rafi Razzak's hands and he has the power to bankrupt the Club.
Not to put too fine a point on it, let's get out of The Camrose to Winklebury, let Razzak get his planning permission and get the quarter million off him, use some of it to tart up Winklebury to at least Step 3 standard and go from there.
It's a fucking sight better than going to Farnborough and it keeps football in Basingstoke. 👍
You done yourself proud tonight Dave as IMO everyone did who spoke regardless of which way the club's heading. Not a bad turnout but in all honesty disappointed with many fans who talk the talk but always seem to have a bigger pressing engagement or work gets in the way Sorry to hear you've decided to give football a miss down where ever we'll be playing next season as it's plain to see you still have so much passion for the club
Thank you Micky. As I said at the meeting it is a great pity that good fans like yourself, Martin, Ian and David Partridge are not more involved and your opinions sought. The present management at the club should really resign after this affair.
I am pleased that the club appear to have been saved and playing in Basingstoke at Winklebury if it goes ahead is not a disaster. The sad thing is we are replacing a multi-million pound modern stadium at Eastrop with a £250K upgrade at the Hampshire FA HQ. You are correct I still hold a lot of feeling for the club and remember taking my sons to virtually every home match and a lot of away matches over many seasons. I think the supporters are superb and deserve so much better than what they have been given. I will monitor who finishes up running the Community Club and if it looks as though we get capable folk on board I will drift back to watching 'stoke. All the very best.
You done yourself proud tonight Dave as IMO everyone did who spoke regardless of which way the club's heading. Not a bad turnout but in all honesty disappointed with many fans who talk the talk but always seem to have a bigger pressing engagement or work gets in the way Sorry to hear you've decided to give football a miss down where ever we'll be playing next season as it's plain to see you still have so much passion for the club
Hold on Some people have jobs where they have responsibilities especially when they are the expert within an account So wind your bloody neck in
Post by davidpartridge on Jul 20, 2017 6:55:43 GMT
Very positive meeting last night, and the council seem very keen to engage with the community club idea. They now seem to grasp the fact that Razzak has to go as quickly as possible if the community club is to get off the ground and be successful.
Lots of questions from councillors about future sponsorship, income, interest from the community etc, and it looks as though this time a proper consultation will be done with the support of the council, and also looking into issues of access, infrastructure etc that may need to be put in place.
Hopefully, this will avoid Old Common 2 scenario, but they did acknowledge that there is a lot of work to be done and will be complex.
Good to note that the covenant is being properly explored and that the council legal team are actively investigating this. This means that we are not this time placing all eggs in one basket and there are two options still on the table. It will also be of use to the council to understand any legal issues on the land if a planning application lands on their doorstep.
Clearly, from the comments of some of those in charge, I still seem to get under their skin. The purpose of my banging on about the covenant has purely been to make sure that Razzak doesn't get away with something that he shouldn't and to protect the future of the club. If he has the legal right to do what he proposes then all well and good, but why doesn't he save everyone a lot of time and simply produce the document which states the covenant has been lifted, perhaps he will now do so and we can all move on.
For those interested either positively or negatively, I will not be coming back to assisting in the operation of the club, but I wish the future of the community club well.
Of course, I wasn't here for the glory years But, never mind, Nev'll Fix It!
We are all different. Some care more then others, some have more commitments than others, some come to matches too more than others, some sing, others don't, some go btg, others don't.
But we are all Btfc fans and every penny we put into the Club through the turnstiles is valuable.
Maybe I would say this as I wasn't there either - I won't justify myself with the reasons why as frankly I don't have to justify myself to anyone - but rather than slate those who didn't come I would rather celebrate those who did go.
Martin, Micky, Steve Williams, Terry Brown and others - sounds like you might just have secured a future for the Club last night and if so that is fantastic. 😊👍⚽️
Although I couldn't physically attend due to having a meeting in Manchester at 4pm (My helicopter is still on order), I followed the meeting via webcast.
I was delighted with the amount of time the council finally made to discuss the football club. All speakers were very positive both from the fans representatives, Steve Williams and Terry Brown. I had mixed views on how the CEO and President came across, but as Ian mentioned this is the time to be positive and look forward. Finally the Hants FA and the club look to be working together - of course lots of big hurdles to get over with regards to winning around the local residents around to ensure we don't have another Old Common. Lets not forget that at the early stages the council were all for the Old Common site. With regards to the covenant, as DP comments it is great that this is finally being taken seriously and that this will be investigated.
As supporters it is key we get behind Terry Brown now and help with some fund raising to cover the playing budget.
This quote in bold here from David partridge is exactly what is needed now.
Clearly, from the comments of some of those in charge, I still seem to get under their skin. The purpose of my banging on about the covenant has purely been to make sure that Razzak doesn't get away with something that he shouldn't and to protect the future of the club. If he has the legal right to do what he proposes then all well and good, but why doesn't he save everyone a lot of time and simply produce the document which states the covenant has been lifted, perhaps he will now do so and we can all move on.
A conclusion one way or the other would allow us to move on to the Community Club, under one banner as much as it possibly can be with the years of history this club has endured, but we could move on.
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this forum belong solely to me a fan & supporter and in no way represent the club, organisation, committee or other group or individual.
I believe the council will add a podcast from last night's meeting. When I'm not sure, but they have done after previous meetings.
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this forum belong solely to me a fan & supporter and in no way represent the club, organisation, committee or other group or individual.
It may be well known that Winklebury does not meet FA ground-grading requirements for Step 3. But as the deadline has long since passed for clubs to do the required work ahead of the 2017/18 season where does this leave the club?
It may be well known that Winklebury does not meet FA ground-grading requirements for Step 3. But as the deadline has long since passed for clubs to do the required work ahead of the 2017/18 season where does this leave the club?
AIUI, games will continue to be played at the Camrose for the time being, a look back at previous threads should bear this out. If this should cease to be the case mid-season, I'm sure the FA would take the circumstances into account, if indeed the ground at Winklebury is not already booked up on BTFC planned matchdays.
Do you know definitively what work needs to be done in order to bring it up to at least the required standard for S3?
The club/Community Club are fully aware of what is needed to meet step 3 grading and this was stated at last night's meeting.
I believe the earliest any move to Winklebury would be September 2018.
Last Edit: Jul 20, 2017 11:21:16 GMT by martinfrench
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this forum belong solely to me a fan & supporter and in no way represent the club, organisation, committee or other group or individual.
Post by mattwarmington on Jul 20, 2017 11:21:40 GMT
Just to echo what has already been said I thought last night was very positive and it was good to get some clarity. I agree with Dave Partridge that we have find out once and for all what the legal position on this covenant is. My concern would be that if the covenant is legally binding then are we stuck? We can't go to Winklebury without Rafi's 250k and we'd still have a rapidly deteriorating Camrose on the hands of the Community Club with Rafi as our landlord.
As Dave said if only Rafi would release the document which shows the covenant is null and void then we can move on to preparing for the future.
I believe it is all in the FA Green Book online if you want to check it out, Ray.
A barrier around the stadium preventing people from viewing the pitch from outside is pretty key, I think.
I think last night sounds positive for the Club.
Dave Partridge's questions about the Covenant are valid, but the bottom line for me is that Winklebury offers the Club lifeline and we want to get that £250,000 out of Rafi Razzak.
Though it understandably makes many sick to the pit of their stomach to give him what he wants, in all probability he cannot be fought legally for various reasons (not least the massive financial risk) and I think it would be great if everyone bought into the idea of Winklebury and no one tried to scupper it.
It keeps football in Basingstoke and provides hope for the future. 👍
I'm really sorry folks bu I am trying hard to understand why people are still holding out hope that there is something in this Covenant issue and it is still cropping up! I try very hard when posting to stick to the facts of the subject I am posting about. After having the opportunity to be able to have people look into this, When it became legally clear there was nothing anyone could do I had to accept this.
Can those people explain clearly to me and others why they do not believe the two experienced independent property Lawyers working for two different firm of Solicitors in the town, who are clear experts in their field and who have looked deep into this (1 as I have said before a BTFC season ticket holder for a good number of years now and the other one who at one time had a slot on BBC Radio Solent a few years back). Why could they not find something wrong in this, perhaps you experts out there can let me and others know.
Do people not think if the two of them had come across good news to pursue it would be out by now along with me pushing it hard! I like many of you held out enormous hope in the beginning that this would bring good news but there comes a time when you have to admit that nothing more can be done, that time has passed.
You also have to remember there is a 3rd experienced Property Lawyer involved in what went on and that is the one at Phillips Solicitors who would have been behind putting it all together. If this deal involving the covenant was a no go from the beginning Rafi would have been advised accordingly and I can assure you all it would not have gone ahead.
Are all 3 really wrong! I don't think so.
What does interest me though is how this was all allowed to happen in the first place and Rafi was happy to let the ground become unprotected because he must have known. I brought this up early in the first Fans Forum when Rafi actually said I had a good point but never answered the question!
RIP CAMROSE - SADLY AND UNCEREMONIOUSLY TAKEN AWAY FROM THE PEOPLE OF BASINGSTOKE . NEVER TO BE FORGOTTEN
Prejudice is a great TIME SAVER. You can form opinions without having to get to the FACTS.
I believe it is all in the FA Green Book online if you want to check it out, Ray.
A barrier around the stadium preventing people from viewing the pitch from outside is pretty key, I think.
I think last night sounds positive for the Club.
Dave Partridge's questions about the Covenant are valid, but the bottom line for me is that Winklebury offers the Club lifeline and we want to get that £250,000 out of Rafi Razzak.
Though it understandably makes many sick to the pit of their stomach to give him what he wants, in all probability he cannot be fought legally for various reasons (not least the massive financial risk) and I think it would be great if everyone bought into the idea of Winklebury and no one tried to scupper it.
It keeps football in Basingstoke and provides hope for the future. 👍
Thanks Ian.
So a perimeter fence of some description seems to be the "big-ticket" item but even that's not on the scale of the work needing to be done at the Camrose to keep it serviceable. At a push, properly erected hoardings could serve until something permanent was arranged and as the Council seem to be (at least in part - depends on the outcome of the investigation into the status of the covenant) behind it, I imagine something could be arranged fairly quickly if Razzak threw what's left of his toys out of the pram and kicked the club out mid-season.
The optimist in me says that RR is not too sure of his position vis. the Covenant otherwise he'd have been waving it around like a trophy already. The cynic says that he's on very solid ground and is waiting for the opportunity to kick the fans where it hurts, one last time.
I've not had time to look at the VT yet, but from what I've read the outcome of the meeting last night is pretty positive and should help in attracting some interest now that one way or another, football will be staying in Basingstoke.
Ground grading regulations are very strict and the higher up the leagues you go the more is required. Look at all of the problems Hayes & Yeading have had getting a safety certificate for their ground. If the club had to vacate the Camrose mid-season it is highly unlikely that they would be allowed to play the remaining home games at a stadium that did not meet Level 3 criteria.
I'm really sorry folks bu I am trying hard to understand why people are still holding out hope that there is something in this Covenant issue and it is still cropping up! I try very hard when posting to stick to the facts of the subject I am posting about. After having the opportunity to be able to have people look into this, When it became legally clear there was nothing anyone could do I had to accept this.
Can those people explain clearly to me and others why they do not believe the two experienced independent property Lawyers working for two different firm of Solicitors in the town, who are clear experts in their field and who have looked deep into this (1 as I have said before a BTFC season ticket holder for a good number of years now and the other one who at one time had a slot on BBC Radio Solent a few years back). Why could they not find something wrong in this, perhaps you experts out there can let me and others know.
Do people not think if the two of them had come across good news to pursue it would be out by now along with me pushing it hard! I like many of you held out enormous hope in the beginning that this would bring good news but there comes a time when you have to admit that nothing more can be done, that time has passed.
You also have to remember there is a 3rd experienced Property Lawyer involved in what went on and that is the one at Phillips Solicitors who would have been behind putting it all together. If this deal involving the covenant was a no go from the beginning Rafi would have been advised accordingly and I can assure you all it would not have gone ahead.
Are all 3 really wrong! I don't think so.
What does interest me though is how this was all allowed to happen in the first place and Rafi was happy to let the ground become unprotected because he must have known. I brought this up early in the first Fans Forum when Rafi actually said I had a good point but never answered the question!
There is a wording in a land registry document from last year that suggests the covenant remains, this being the major part of the argument put up by the two David's last night. A couple of Cllrs also commented on their experience with covenants.
Most of us don't know who to believe if we're honest and that's why clarity is needed. I have no reason to disbelieve your lawyers or the research done by the two David's but they are at odds and until this is crystal clear I don't see how we can move on.
FWIW I reckon Rafi has been planning this for a very long time.
Although im annoyed as hell about it, I think I agree with steve, I dont like it one bit, but lets be honest sooner Rafi is gone the better.
I'm 100% behind the Winkelbury move, and although I get why some fans want to take it as far as possible, we need to look forward, and that means moving out of the camrose.
There is a wording in a land registry document from last year that suggests the covenant remains, this being the major part of the argument put up by the two David's last night. A couple of Cllrs also commented on their experience with covenants.
Most of us don't know who to believe if we're honest and that's why clarity is needed. I have no reason to disbelieve your lawyers or the research done by the two David's but they are at odds and until this is crystal clear I don't see how we can move on.
FWIW I reckon Rafi has been planning this for a very long time.
The above wording Matt I Am well aware of, in fact I was asked to look into it as well and nothing changes believe me. You say most of you don't know who to believe, well if it was people outside of the legal profession giving you the information I have then I can understand that quote but it's not. It would appear Matt that some of the people on here you included are hanging on for grim life that 3 Property Lawyers must be wrong so we cannot believe what Steve is telling us, let's believe instead at least one chap who is not qualified but is studying a course on Law instead, or a couple of councillors who have experience in covenants but do not deal daily with the property legal system, It's madness.
If any of you were dealing with a property Lawyer and the Lawyer told you something how many times are you going to question it or seek another Lawyers opinion or even better go to a family friend or a forum for advice?
I'm telling you now 3 Property Lawyers have been tied up in this and all of them cannot and in fact are not wrong. The clarity has already been put out there with the answers I have found, a few of you just don't want to believe it and are giving others false hope to cling too.
I am in a unique position of being able to tap into the property legal system for nothing and have taken that opportunity to look into this frommday 1. Two other people on here know this full well and have had the opportunity as well to ask me questions and to get answers. One has done so more than the other, who decided to go his own way, that's fair enough his choice. One has even said he does not have the funds to engage with Lawyers, he does not have to because he had the opportunity to go through me to get the information he wanted for nothing. Why would I tell lies to you all when I have the club at heart as we all do!
I'm sorry but that's the truth.
RIP CAMROSE - SADLY AND UNCEREMONIOUSLY TAKEN AWAY FROM THE PEOPLE OF BASINGSTOKE . NEVER TO BE FORGOTTEN
Prejudice is a great TIME SAVER. You can form opinions without having to get to the FACTS.
Post by mattwarmington on Jul 20, 2017 15:01:55 GMT
I am absolutely not hanging on for grim death that your lawyers are wrong, like Chewy I'm 100% behind the move to Winklebury if it secures the future of our club but I am really upset it has come to this. Rafi Razzak has done the dirty on the club and the town (this must not be forgotten by anyone). He has now managed to hold us to ransom to the extent that the move to Winklebury is our only option and the cash to make it happen is predicated on planning permission, which will be fought against and could take a long time. Our club is at the mercy of architects and planners!!
I'm calling for clarity on the covenant to help move our club forward and ensure we can afford the Winklebury move. Perhaps you could take up Cllr Golding's invitation last night to submit the work you have done to help make things clearer for all.
I agree with Matt's point. Putting the Covenant to one side for a moment I feel certain there is one thing we can agree on. That is the sheer fact that it has taken the ordinary fans on the terracing to reach this point. A determined effort prevented the move to Farnborough and now it seems to have possibly secured a home in Basingstoke.
It has taken much research and effort throughout without any information being given up by the club in our quest for answers. As I said last night the club have a great group of supporters and they can be proud of their efforts. What is required now is that the club starts listening to them and act on the feedback they receive.
Another point brought up by Simon Hood's replacement was the money Simon generated a few seasons back and where it went.
The Winklebury project will cost a lot of money and that is going to come probably from the Basingstoke taxpayer through the Community Club project as we understand it. The ground at present would barely reach Hampshire League standards and definitely not Combined County League standards.
I was pleased to get my 2 minute slot after agreement with the Labour and Tory leaders just 5 minutes before the meeting started. Luckily I had prepared a few notes before going to the meeting.
So we move on and the club need to get some new people with a professional outlook at the helm to prevent this sorry state of affairs ever happening again.
I am absolutely not hanging on for grim death that your lawyers are wrong, like Chewy I'm 100% behind the move to Winklebury if it secures the future of our club but I am really upset it has come to this. Rafi Razzak has done the dirty on the club and the town (this must not be forgotten by anyone). He has now managed to hold us to ransom to the extent that the move to Winklebury is our only option and the cash to make it happen is predicated on planning permission, which will be fought against and could take a long time. Our club is at the mercy of architects and planners!!z
I'm calling for clarity on the covenant to help move our club forward and ensure we can afford the Winklebury move. Perhaps you could take up Cllr Golding's invitation last night to submit the work you have done to help make things clearer for all.
Matt, first I forgot to add from your previous post, your right and it's clear Rafi has had this planned for some time.
I will not be submitting any work to Cllr Golding's invitation at all to make things clearer. The council have their own in house Lawyers who will find exactly what the others have when and if they look. In fact things could not be any clearer for me on the issues as my wife who is one of the Property Lawyers I am dealing with and is extremely good at her job (personally head hunted by companies on 3 occasions tells me that), her research and her word to me is good enough for me to know and understand after her looking into it. She happens to know the other Club supporting Lawyer who undertook his own research and came up with the same conclusion. They in turn know the reputation of the Property Lawyer who acted for Rafi on the issue and know that he too has a good reputation and would not have been able to move forward had that been the case.
I will I'll agree with you that Like you I am upset this has happened and have gone on record as saying the issue stinks. I also agree that the Towns people should never forget what Rafi has done here and I cannot think he was the only one involved who knew where this was heading.
RIP CAMROSE - SADLY AND UNCEREMONIOUSLY TAKEN AWAY FROM THE PEOPLE OF BASINGSTOKE . NEVER TO BE FORGOTTEN
Prejudice is a great TIME SAVER. You can form opinions without having to get to the FACTS.
I back you 100%, but until the council either find the covenant or their lawyers get involved, then this could delay the move to Winklebury.
Also well done to last night's speakers Terry Brown, Martin French & Steve Williams, they proved the club can be run well going forward behind TB's management.
Like a lot of other fans I overheard last night, was Alan Turvey who seems to get more confusing by the minute. He may have connections, but his display at the Fans Forum and last night are far from desirable.